Snippets

Quick Takes

Short updates from GAO, CRS, and the Federal Register with quick analysis on why they matter for government contracting.
Subscribe to Snippets RSS

Halves and Halves Not

DLA planned to procure "423 coupling halves" using a "special emergency procurement authority" and set the procurement aside for small businesses. After a pre-award protest by Chase, DLA canceled the solicitation, and issued a second solicitation with a smaller request for 176 coupling halves. After DLA made an award, Chase protested again. DLA took corrective action to cancel the solicitation and award. GAO dismissed the protest of the second solicitation as academic. GAO also reaffirmed that "an agency may cancel a solicitation during the course of a protest," rejecting Chase's claims related to the first cancellation.

GAO: Chase Supply, Inc., d/b/a Chase Defense Partners, B-424032 (Jan 20, 2026)

If the RFP wants escalation rates, you need to include them or the agency will include them for you

Solicitation required that labor rates escalate each year in the period of performance. Protestor didn't include an escalation rate and agency applied a default rate. Protestor claimed this was unreasonable but GAO disagreed, noting that the solicitation required it. Also, protestor claimed a "bait and switch" in the awardee's staffing plan, but GAO found that the agency never took the bait.

GAO: Imagine One Technology & Management, Ltd., B-422875.3,B-422875.4 (Jan 02, 2026)

Get Snippets in your inbox

Subscribe to receive Quick Takes directly—short analysis on what matters in government contracting.

Unconnected various arrows and unlabeled graphics

Protestor argued that agency's assessment of technical approach was flawed. GAO's view was that the protest was just "disagreement with the agency's evaluation judgment" and that the protestor's slides weren't sufficiently clear ("We likewise see no basis to fault the agency for not connecting various arrows and unlabeled graphics on one slide to various statements on subsequent slides"). Ergo, protest denied.

GAO: H2 Technology Group, LLC, B-423777,B-423777.2 (Dec 15, 2025)

If Part 13, then no debrief

Protestor filed a protest more than 10 days after a post-award brief explanation. Because the acquisition followed Part 13 procedures, not Part 15, no debrief was required and the protest was untimely.

Also, in the govcon-time-is-a-flat-circle category: the solicitation was marked "urgent" with proposals due in 4 days, with "boots on ground" within 40 days. Curiously, the award notice came 6 months later, 211 days after the solicitation release.

GAO: ASG Solutions Corporation d/b/a American Systems Group, B-424053 (Jan 16, 2026)

Preference Pecking Order

The VA noticed intent to sole source "switchboard services" under the AbilityOne program to the Central Association for the Blind under the Javits-Wagner-O'Day (JWOD) Act. Protestor claimed that this violated the Veterans First Contracting Program's Rule of Two for SDVOSBs or VOSBs. GAO explained that the Department of Veterans Affairs Contracting Preference Consistency Act addresses the conflict and JWOD has priority. Protest denied.

GAO: Magellan Solutions USA, Inc., B-423857 (Jan 12, 2026)

Scope drift

Protestor's claim that a Navy IDIQ didn't cover AI/ML was tossed because the contract covered "technical tasks, including those that involve the optimal utilization of IT tools and software development." Why wasn't AI/ML included explicitly five years ago? "At the time the [IDIQ] was issued nearly five years ago, utilization of AI/ML was not sufficiently widespread to be included in the performance work statement." But a broad scope covered the new tech and the $35 million threshold applied, so the protest was dismissed.

GAO: JDSAT, Inc., B-423868 (Jan 12, 2026)

Subscribe to GovContrActually

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe