Snippets

Quick Takes

Short updates from GAO, CRS, and the Federal Register with quick analysis on why they matter for government contracting.
Subscribe to Snippets RSS

Unconnected various arrows and unlabeled graphics

Protestor argued that agency's assessment of technical approach was flawed. GAO's view was that the protest was just "disagreement with the agency's evaluation judgment" and that the protestor's slides weren't sufficiently clear ("We likewise see no basis to fault the agency for not connecting various arrows and unlabeled graphics on one slide to various statements on subsequent slides"). Ergo, protest denied.

GAO: H2 Technology Group, LLC, B-423777,B-423777.2 (Dec 15, 2025)

If Part 13, then no debrief

Protestor filed a protest more than 10 days after a post-award brief explanation. Because the acquisition followed Part 13 procedures, not Part 15, no debrief was required and the protest was untimely.

Also, in the govcon-time-is-a-flat-circle category: the solicitation was marked "urgent" with proposals due in 4 days, with "boots on ground" within 40 days. Curiously, the award notice came 6 months later, 211 days after the solicitation release.

GAO: ASG Solutions Corporation d/b/a American Systems Group, B-424053 (Jan 16, 2026)

Preference Pecking Order

The VA noticed intent to sole source "switchboard services" under the AbilityOne program to the Central Association for the Blind under the Javits-Wagner-O'Day (JWOD) Act. Protestor claimed that this violated the Veterans First Contracting Program's Rule of Two for SDVOSBs or VOSBs. GAO explained that the Department of Veterans Affairs Contracting Preference Consistency Act addresses the conflict and JWOD has priority. Protest denied.

GAO: Magellan Solutions USA, Inc., B-423857 (Jan 12, 2026)

Scope drift

Protestor's claim that a Navy IDIQ didn't cover AI/ML was tossed because the contract covered "technical tasks, including those that involve the optimal utilization of IT tools and software development." Why wasn't AI/ML included explicitly five years ago? "At the time the [IDIQ] was issued nearly five years ago, utilization of AI/ML was not sufficiently widespread to be included in the performance work statement." But a broad scope covered the new tech and the $35 million threshold applied, so the protest was dismissed.

GAO: JDSAT, Inc., B-423868 (Jan 12, 2026)

Guidehouse gambled, and lost

Guidehouse received a "no-confidence" rating on its staffing plan after it deviated from the solicitation's "staffing matrix" to offer a lower price. On protest, the agency argued that the staffing plan "relied on unsupported and inadequately explained assumption" and didn't articulate benefits to the agency. GAO sided with the agency. Protest denied.

GAO: Guidehouse Digital, LLC, B-423833,B-423833.2 (Jan 05, 2026)

MAS Refresh 31

A whole bunch of changes coming to the Multiple Award Schedule beginning in February. Some of what's in? Transactional Data Reporting expansion; AI-compliance language and inclusion of Revolutionary FAR Overhaul deviations; and adjustments to the OLM SIN. There's a webinar scheduled for February 10, 2026.

GSA: Advanced Notice for MAS Refresh 31 and Upcoming Mass Modification (Jan. 12, 2026)

Subscribe to GovContrActually

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe